Thursday, August 7, 2014

Expert Analysis or Snake Oil?

Every week, MLSSoccer.com releases their power rankings, its supposed experts' views on how various team are supposed to play the next few rounds. However, most of the time there isn't really any real analysis and lots of biased malarkey.

For instance, when San Jose was on a hot streak towards the end of last season, they  were still stuck around 12th on the list and covered it up with trash like, "Pretty depressing results for the Quakes this past weekend. Obvious must-win against Colorado on Wednesday night," and, "If either Colorado or LA lose this weekend, San Jose will be one point out of the playoffs and even on games played. With games against Colorado and LA coming up. Parity rules."

In contrast, PremierLeague.com provides the scores of last six games instead of trying to rank its teams. So, I decided to compare the power rankings with form (PPG from their last five games) and see which one comes closer to the next five games PPG. I decided to take one week from the beginning and end of the year to see if it makes any difference.

The average difference is the average of all MLS teams' differences between expected results(PPG of Power rankings rank) and the actual result(next five games PPG). For example, if FC Dallas is first in the power rankings but only ranks 13th in PPG from their next five games, their difference would be twelve. The averages are totaled up for all MLS teams and averaged to figure out the average difference.

 Week Power Rankings average differenceLast 5 PPG average difference
136.055.2
3154.5

Although slightly, the PPG still outpreforms power rankings. Probably if the strength of schedule is also factored in, the results will become even more precise, possibly an interesting topic to explore in the future.

If interested, here is a link to the raw data
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YGe93Dr2P9Jy2WVHyC3Y6ztEZbPA-I7nxM4541kk6fg/edit#gid=0

Thursday, April 17, 2014

MLS Head Coaching Bias Part 2: Playing Experience

At the end of my post on MLS coaches lacking experience, I mentioned that I also was going to follow up with a look at if MLS teams also prefer head coaches with playing experience. Here is a table comparing the top two leagues in the world, La Liga and the EPL with MLS

 League  Percent of head coaches w/ playing experience  Fraction 
MLS95%18/19
EPL100%20/20
La Liga85%17/20

Interestingly, all leagues overlook managers with no playing experience. The only manager who has no managing or playing experience, Fran Escribia of Elche, led them to the first division after a 25 year absence. The only MLS head coach with no professional playing experience is Sigi Schmid - who has the most wins in the history of MLS. MLS and teams all around the world should stop having this prejudice while looking for a new head coach and reap the rewards.

MLS Head Coaching Bias Part 1: Coaching Experience

Recently, I noticed a trend of MLS coaches being hired for their first professional head coaching gig. although guys like Caleb Porter offer a new perspective on building a team, I thought it may not be the best idea. So, I took a look and compared the percentage of first-time MLS Head Coaches and the percentages of the top two leagues in the world. I didn't include college and youth national team coaching as 'experience'(sorry Caleb Porter and John Hackworth), but decided to put Francisco Javier Rodríguez Vilchez of Almeria in the head coaching experience group due to the fact that he coached Almeria's B team, which plays in the Spanish third division

 League  Percent of first time head coaches  Fraction 
MLS68%13/19
EPL15%3/20
La Liga10%2/20

Even more frightening, there is only one MLS head coach to have started outside MLS. Even though coaches like Aron Winter and Ruud Gullit have failed in MLS, experienced managers tend to preform better due to the 10,000 hour rule mentioned in Malcolm Gladwell's book Outliers. Teams should also stop hiring just managers with playing experience. When Carlo Ancelotti was asked about the subject of playing experience, he commented, "I don't see the connection. My dentist is the best in the world, but he's never had a particularly bad toothache." I'll take look at that in a future post.

Which wins championships, offense or defense

Bear Bryant once famously proclaimed, "Offense sells tickets, but defense wins championships." Football statisticians have proved that wrong so I decided to check if that is true in soccer too. So I took a look back at MLS Cups and conference finals going back to 2002 and looked at the team's goals for and goals against to determine which team is better offensively and which team is better defensively. The results are below.

Better Offense, Better DefenseBetter Offense, Worse DefenseWorse Offense, Better DefenseWorse Offense, Worse Defense
1112103

The takeaway here is that it doesn't matter in the battle between offense and defense. A trend I noticed was thyat generally, in the first few MLS Cups, more defensive teams won. In 2003, only better defensive, worse offensive teams won. In comparison, 2012 was only better offensive, worse defensive teams.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Does possession matter?

Last month when Michael Bradley commented that possession is overrated, it rekindled an age old debate whether more possession leads to more wins. The MLSsoccer.com article took the opposing side, citing a graph showing the percentage of teams with more than 50 percent of the possession who made the playoffs. Around the same time, the MLSsoccer.com also published an article that San Jose Earthquakes, the winner of Supporter’s shield in 2012 was the best attacking team in the MLS history. When checking their stats, I noticed that they managed to win many times despite having less possession. I digged deeper - and San Jose Earthquakes are not alone, so did New York Red Bulls on their way to winning Supporter Shield in 2013 - in fact they had a very convincing win over Dynamo (3-0) with as little as 39% possession. I picked up few more games at random, and sure enough there were plenty of examples in MLS last season where side with lower possession won.

At this point, I decided to investigate further, collecting more data points systematically. I picked up three rounds (2, 18 and 32) in the beginning, middle and end of the season and looked at all the games that produced a result.What I found was that there is some positive correlation between more possession and winning, unfortunately the correlation is not very strong, as shown below(I didn't include ties):

 More Possession  Equal Possession(49-51%)  Less Possession 
13 wins7 wins12 wins

So, I would rather agree with Michael Bradley, possession is indeed over rated. It is a factor but not an overwhelming one, at least in MLS. In search of other factors,  I looked at few other statistics like total shots, shots on goal, duals won etc. So far I have not been able to find any single overwhelming factor but found that shots on target has higher correlation with win than possession. I took the same games from last year and compared the winning and losing team's shots on goal data.

 More Shots on Goal  Equal Shots on Goal  Less Shots on Goal 
17 wins8 wins7 wins

As a side note, I observed that only three teams in 32 games managed to win in spite of having less possession and also with fewer shots on goal. For one of them, possession was almost equal (47% vs 53%) and difference of shots on goal was just 1;  in another instance, the winning team’s goalkeeper was MOTM, and in the third case the winning side had two stoppage time goals. I'll be sure to revisit this topic in a future post with more factors and data and hope to pinpoint three things which a team must focus on in order to win.
*Here is a link to the data which I have collected

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Thousand minute rule explained

While commenting on MLS Superdraft, I mentioned that almost all future stars of MLS played at least 1000 minutes in their first two seasons. The only notable exceptions are Chris Wondolowski and a handful of goalkeepers - who anyway are usually late bloomers. I got the idea that such a rule might exist from Malcom Gladwell's book Outliers - The story of success. The second chapter of the book "10,000 hour rule" tells us that in any field, from music to ice hockey to computer programming, there are no "natural"s, most successful people have actually practiced much harder to their peers during their formative years. Here is a look at the number of minutes played for drafted players who later became successful in MLS, using the top 100 Castrol Index for 2013 as the success criteria.

Player Castrol Index rank Year of joining MLS
Number of minutes played in first two seasons
Mike Magee             3 (2003) - 3238
Chris Wondolowski             5 (2005) - 203
Jack McInerney             6 (2010) - 1026
Nick Rimando             7 (2000) - 4302
Eddie Johnson             9 (2001) - 611    (Started at age of 17)
Graham Zusi            10 (2009) - 1064
Ryan Johnson            15 (2006 + 2008) - 1733  (Did not play in 2007)
Will Bruin           18 (2011) - 4731
Drew Moor           19 (2005) - 3433
Dominic Oduro           22 (2006) - 1638
John Busch           23 (2002) -  3900
Zac MacMath           26 (2011) - 3555
Shea Salinas           27 (2008) - 1850
Brad Davis           32 (2002) - 3154
Nathan Sturgis           33 (2006) - 2393
Rodney Wallace           34 (2009) -  3189
Chad Marshall           36 (2004) - 5101
Matt Besler           37 (2009) -  3252
Dilly Duka           40 (2010) - 1624
George John           41 (2009) -  3600
Deshorn Brown           42 (2013) - 2169 (only first year)
Omar González           43 (2009) -  5851
Amobi Okugo           51 (2010) - 1248
Patrick Nyarko           52 (2008) -  2254
Chance Myers           53 (2008) -  846   (Had an injury in second year)
Bernardo Anor           54 (2011) - 1133
Ike Opara           55 (2010) - 1399
Matt Hedges           57 (2012) - 4815
Dan Kennedy           63 (2008 + 2010) - 1293  (Did not play in 2009)
Dillon Powers           64 (2013) - 2457 (only first year)
Stephen McCarthy           65 (2011) - 3746
Todd Dunivant           66 (2003) -  4258
A.J. DeLaGarza           69 (2009) -  3482
Warren Creavalle           72 (2012) -  2504
Darlington Nagbe           75 (2011) -  4428
Michael Farfan           76 (2011) -  4262
Kelyn Rowe           78 (2012) - 4630
Justin Mapp           84 (2002) -  1476
Seth Sinovic           85 (2010) -  3582
Ricardo Clark           94 (2003) -  4355
Jeff Larentowicz           95 (2005) -  1975

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Trading scorecard of MLS teams

In the previous post, I mentioned that I would go in-depth about the anomalies behind the performance of MLS teams and their player recruitment scorecard - Superdraft and overseas combined. I think I have found why teams like Real Salt lake and San Jose have done so well even though they did not recruit that many quality players through Superdraft and overseas recruitment.

Let's take a look at the third source of player recruitment - trade, specially the trades that have resulted in the receiving team having a player in the top 100 PAR list from 2011 onwards. Both Real Salt Lake and San Jose Earthquake have managed to lure away 5 elite players from other teams! RSL's best trade is Kyle Beckerman from Colorado and Earthquake's best trade is Chris Wondolowski  from Houston! By comparison, Dallas has gained 3 players via trade and two of them have not made any contribution in last two years. They are sort of middle of the pack (11th in points earned last 3 seasons) even though their combined Superdraft and overseas recruitment scorecard is pretty good - 5 th.

TeamNumber of players recruited via trades who have made the
top 150 list at least  one of
the seasons 2011 or 2012 or 2013
Player (highest PAR position, best year) - year of trade
Chicago3Mike Magee (4, 2013)  - 2013
Dominic Oduro (19, 2011) - 2011
Dilly Duka (54, 2013) - 2013
Chivas3Juan Pablo Angel (41, 2011) - 2011
Nick LaBrocca (48, 2011) - 2011
Heath Pearce (75, 2011) - 2011
Colorado5Drew Moor (2, 2011) - 2009
Marvell Wynne (30, 2011) - 2010
Jeff Larentowicz (45, 2011) - 2010
Nathan Sturgis (61, 2013) - 2013
Matt Pickens (67, 2012) - 2009
Columbus2Dominic Oduro (23, 2013) - 2013
Eddie Gaven (47, 2011) - 2006
DC United2Dwayne DeRosario (26, 2011) - 2011
Maicon Santos (58, 2012) - 2012 
Dallas3Ugo Ihemelu (9, 2011) - 2009
Kevin Hartman (41, 2012) - 2010
Maicon Santos (53, 2011) - 2011
Houston4Bobby Boswell (6, 2011) - 2008
Macoumba Kandji (44, 2012) - 2012
Brad Davis (44, 2011) - 2005
Calen Carr (57, 2012) - 2011
LA Galaxy2Todd Dunivant (27, 2011) - 2009
Edson Buddle (96, 2012) - 2012
Montreal1Troy Perkins (54, 2012) - 2012
New England0
New York3Kenny Cooper (14, 2012) - 2012
Fabian Espindola (64, 2013) - 2013
Jamison Olave (68, 2013) - 2013
Philadelphia2Conor Casey (30, 2013) - 2013
Sebastien Le Toux (69, 2013) - 2012
Portland5Donovan Ricketts(1, 2013) - 2012
Ryan Johnson (24, 2013) - 2013
Rodney Wallace (60, 2013) - 2011
Will Johnson (65, 2013) - 2013
Jack Jewsbury (80, 2011) - 2011
Real Salt Lake5Nick Rimando (5, 2013) - 2006
Kyle Beckerman (50, 2013) - 2007
Will Johnson (59, 2011) - 2008
Robbie Findley (71, 2013) - 2007
Chris Wingert (98, 2011) - 2007
San Jose Earthquakes5Chris Wondolowski (2, 2012) - 2009
Steven Lenhart (4, 2012) - 2011
Alan Gordon (8, 2012) - 2011
Shea Salinas (52, 2013) - 2012
Marvin Chavez (100, 2012) - 2012
Seattle2Eddie Johnson (13, 2013) - 2012
Lamar Neagle (22, 2013) - 2013
Sporting Kansas City3Kei Kamara (6, 2012) - 2009
Ike Opara (35, 2013) - 2013
Benny Feilhaber (39, 2013) - 2013
Toronto2Ryan Johnson (39, 2012) - 2011
Milos Kocic (66, 2011) - 2010
Vancouver1Brad Knighton (57, 2013) - 2012


3 Year team performance and combined (Superdraft plus overseas) recruitment scorecard of MLS teams

First, here is a table I made to rank the overall team performance of all MLS teams over the last three years. Excluded Montreal since they joined only in 2012.

TeamPoints 2011+12+13Rank
Chicago43 + 57 + 49 = 1498
Chivas36 + 30 + 26 = 9217
Colorado49 + 37 + 51 = 13710
Columbus47 + 52 + 41 = 1409
DC United38 + 59 + 16 = 11316
Dallas52 + 39 + 44 = 13511
Houston49 + 53 + 51 = 1537
LA Galaxy67 + 54 + 53 = 1741
New England28 + 35 + 51 = 11415
New York46 + 57 + 59 = 1625
Philadelphia48 + 36 + 46 = 13013
Portland42 + 34 + 57 = 13312
Real Salt Lake53 + 57 + 56 = 1664
San Jose Earthquakes38 + 66 + 51 = 1556
Seattle63 + 56 + 52 = 1713
Sporting Kansas City51 + 63 + 58 =1722
Toronto33 + 23 + 29 = 8518
Vancouver28 + 43 + 48 =  11914

Next, I added the quality players (based on PAR rating) recruited from Drafts and overseas. I included players drafted via Superdraft and overseas since 2009, for Portland and Vancouver, since 2011. The first row in the table is of course no surprise - LA Galaxy has twice won MLS Cup in last 3 years and they managed to recruit 15 top quality players via Superdraft or overseas, including players like Omar Gonzalvez and Robbie Keane. In the top one third of the table, (1-6), there are couple of surprises though. Performance rank of Real Salt Lake is 4th, but their combined recruitment scorecard is 12th! Even stranger anomaly is 6th position holder San Jose Earthquakes, their combined recruitment score card is 17th of 18 teams, only recruited 6 quality players via Superdraft and from overseas clubs!

I will look at this anomaly at a future post.

TeamSuperdraft players + overseas recruits = TotalRank(Total)
1. LA Galaxy6 + 9  = 151-T
2. Sporting Kansas City6 + 6  = 127-T
3. Seattle2 + 12 = 143-T
4. Real Salt Lake3 + 6 = 912-T
5. New York4 + 11 = 151-T
6. San Jose Earthquakes4 + 2 = 617-T
7. Houston4 + 5 = 912-T
8. Chicago Fire4 + 6 = 109-T
9. Columbus3 + 6 = 912-T
10. Colorado3 + 3 = 617-T
11. Dallas4 + 9 = 135-T
12. Portland2 + 6 = 815
13. Philadelphia7 + 3 = 109-T
14. Vancouver2 + 10 = 127-T
15. New England9 + 5  = 143-T
16. DC United6 + 1 = 716
17. Chivas6 + 4 = 109-T
18. Toronto6 + 7  = 135-T

A lot of things stand out from this list. San Jose is in the top third but are tied for last in overall player recruits. Dallas is tied for fifth but is stuck in the second third and New England are tied for third but dwell in the bottom third. I'll address these issues in the next post.

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Overseas player recruitment scorecard of MLS teams

In my previous post about the Superdraft, I showed that some teams drafted better than others based on Superdrafts from 2010 to 2012. But, some teams like Seattle have done very well even though they did not find any gems in Superdrafts between 2010 to 2012; only one of their recruits (Alex Caskey) has played more than 1000 minutes in his first two years So why is that? There are multiple ways to acquire talent and now I'll take a look at another source - international players.

I'll take a look at another source of talent - overseas clubs. Most clubs have at least couple of their starters recruited internationally, mostly from CONCACAF countries or South American countries though rich clubs like LA and New York have recruited some of the top players from Europe.

Not all overseas recruits make an impact for their MLS clubs though, in fact less than half have done it. I have made a list of overseas players who have made to either  Castrol Index or PAR list in at least one of the years from 2011 to 2013. PAR list is not widely known, so let me tell a bit about it. It stands for Points Above Replacement and was created by Dave Laidig, and is modeled after baseball’s Wins Above Replacement  (WAR) stats. More details can be found at www.par-stat.com. I found that the list of names are mostly common but a few players who have played very well for few games but didn't play much did not make it to the Castrol Index list but made it to the PAR list. This is because Castrol Index gives high weight to number of minutes played. One example is Vancouver's Kekuta Manneh (recruited via Superdraft)

TeamNumber of overseas
recruits who has made the
top 150 list at least  one of
the seasons 2011 or 2012 or 2013
Three best overseas recruits
Chicago6Marco Pappa
Arne Friedrich
Alex
Chivas4Maicon Santos
Erick Torres
Michael Umana
Colorado3Hendry Thomas
Jaime Castrillon
Jamie Smith
Columbus6Federico Higuaín
Jairo Arrieta
Emilio Renteria
DC United1Hamdi Salihi 
Dallas9David Ferreira
Jair Benitez
Marvin Chavez
Houston5Oscar Boniek García
Jermaine Taylor
Lovel Palmer 
LA Galaxy9Robbie Keane
David Beckham
Juninho
Montreal6Marco Di Vaio
Felipe Martins
Alessandro Nesta
New England5Jose Gonçalves
Saer Sene
Jerry Bengtson
New York11Tim Cahill
Thierry Henry
Juan Pablo Angel
Philadelphia3Lionard Pajoy
Keon Daniel
Carlos Valdes
Portland6Diego Valeri
Pa-Modou Kah
Diego Chara
Real Salt Lake6Javier Morales
Fabian Espindola
Jamison Olave
San Jose Earthquakes2Victor Bernardez
Simon Dawkins
Seattle12Osvaldo Alonso
Mauro Rosales
Fredy Montero
Sporting Kansas City6Aurelien Collin
Jimmy Nielsen
Oriol Rosell 
Toronto7Danny Kovermans
Adrian Cann
Robert Earnshaw
Vancouver10Camilo
Gershon Koffie
Lee Young-Pyo

-One of the tools many MLS clubs utilize is agent Alejandro Taraciuk. Taracuik is a former MLS intern-turned-agent who helped establish Real Salt Lake's 2009 championship team by recommending Fabian Espindola, Javier Morales, and Jamison Olave. Taracuik pratically represents MLS in South America; he also brought Jorge Perlaza, Diego Chara, and Diego Valeri to Portland as well as Fredy Montero and Jhon Kennedy Hurtado to Seattle. Taraciuk also said, "I have been responsible for bringing approximately 70 players to the league and without doubt Diego Valeri is one of the best players I have placed in MLS." It would be interesting to find the role of agents in international players coming in. Teams also seem to focus around certain regions like Montreal in Italy.

-It is worth noting that there is no direct co-relation between recruiting quality players from overseas clubs and success in MLS. Dallas has recruited 9 international players and  Vancouver has 10 players who have been starters for them, still they had far less success than San Jose, who have just two significant overseas recruits during the same period - and Simon Dawkins of them was on loan from parent club Tottenham. So really they just have Victor Bernardez to show for.

So, there are more ways to assemble a good team, than drafting and overseas scouting. I'll cover it in a future post.

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Superdraft score card of MLS teams


Well, some say that past performance is no guarantee for future performance. But on the eve of the Superdraft, I decided to give my two cents. I decided to base my research on recent years instead of last 10 years since the coaching staff for many clubs survives for around three years and no current coach has survived in the same team for ten years.

My methodology is simple; I just checked the picks made by various MLS teams in the 2010/2011/2012 Superdrafts and count the number of players they picked up who played in MLS for 1000 minutes or more in their rookie and sophomore year combined. I picked up 1000 minutes for couple of reasons. First, 1000 minutes imply that the player has at least few starts and is definitely much more than late sub. Second and most important, I found some thing interesting, almost all future stars of MLS played at least 1000 minutes in their first two seasons. Only big exception is Chris Wondowlski and a handful of goalkeepers, who anyways are usually late bloomers. So, while playing for 1000 minutes in the first couple of seasons always do not lead to a future successful MLS career, they are almost a pre-requisite and indicates a good pick.

The table below is almost like a kaleidoscope! You twist and turn it and look at it from another angle and you would get a different winner ! For example, if we use the sum of the top 3 players (playing minutes wise) as the winning criteria, Chicago is the clear winner! However, no matter which way one looks at it,  it is pretty obvious that in teams like Philly, Chicago, New England and DC are far superior to San Jose, Seattle and Colorado in picking up right player at Superdraft. Another interesting side note, as you'd probably guess, Toronto's three 1,000 minute guys? All are no longer with the team.

Note: I did not include Portland, Vancouver and Montreal, since they did not participate in all three of the Superdrafts 2010-12

TeamNumber of draft picks who played
1000+ minutes in first two seasons
Three players who clocked most minutes
Chicago3Austin Berry (5580)
Jalil Anibaba (5441)
Sean Johnson (3690)
Chivas4Ben Zemanski (3599)
Zarek Valentin (3275)
Blair Gavin (2327)
Colorado1Tony Cascio (2222)
Andre Akpan (492)
Ross LaBauex (485)
Columbus3Rich Balchan (1705)
Dilly Duka (1624)
Justin Meram (1475)
DC United4Perry Kitchen (5890)
Nick DeLeon (4087)
Chris Korb (3341)
Dallas3Matt Hedges (4815)
Zach Loyd (4496)
Eric Alexander (2272)
Houston3Will Bruin (4731)
Warren Creavalle (2504)
Kofi Sarkodie (1804)
LA Galaxy4Michael Stephens (3005)
Tommy Meyer (1694)
Paolo Cardozo (1513)
New England6A.J. Soares (5075)
Kelyn Rowe (4630)
Stephen McCarthy (3746)
New York3Tim Ream (5670)
Tony Tchani (1722)
Ryan Meara (1620)
Philadelphia7Raymon Gaddis (4278)
Michael Farfan (4262)
Zac MacMath (3555)
Real Salt Lake3Chris Schuler (1728)
Collen Warner (1566)
Sebastian Velasquez (1537)
San Jose Earthquakes2Steven Beitashour (2295)
Ike Opara (1399)
Justin Morrow (869)
Seattle1Alex Caskey (1093)
Brian Meredith (990)
Servando Carrasco (924)
Sporting Kansas City2CJ Sapong (4306)
Teal Bunbury (3431)
Dom Dwyer (678)
Toronto3Luis Silva (4043)
Joao Plata (2391)
Aaron Maund (1217)

Reality check on the MLS Superdraft

In the last couple of weeks MLS web sites have been buzzing with Superdraft related material - and for good reason, the big day is just around the corner on the 16th. Instead of joining the bandwagon and starting the speculation of who will be drafted by which team and whose stock is rising or falling, I asked myself the question how much Superdraft really means to the MLS teams.

First, let me explain my methodology.

I made a list of top 100 players who are the "elite" class of players from 2013 using the Castrol Index; I picked 100 players since that represents approximately top 20% - MLS now has about 500 players among its 19 teams. The coaches would like to get their entire first eleven from these two groups, but only MLS Champion Kansas City managed to do this. Most teams had 4 to 6.

The Superdraft is not the only source of recruitment for MLS clubs. Clubs often recruit from overseas, which  includes Europe, South America and other CONCACAF countries. MLS teams also hold try-outs, and use their academies to develop "home grown" players. They also recruit players from the lower tiers of North American soccer, like the NASL and USL. MLS also recruits American players playing abroad and allocates them to a team via their allocation process.

What I found interesting is that Superdraft brought only 41 of 100 elite players to MLS, but remember these players were recruited over a span of 14 years from 2000 to 2013, so on average each year's super draft brought only about three future stars to MLS. Overseas players recruited 34 out of 100, is the next major source. All other sources roughly contributed one fourth.

So, what does this tell us ?

First, Superdraft is not the only definitely source of recruiting quality players; overseas may be more expensive and the players may take more time to adapt to MLS' physical style of play, but that is the distance between the playoff teams and non-playoff teams(You can see that Real Salt Lake got a head start in 2007 and 2008 by signing Fabian Espindola, Javier Morales, and Jamison Olave long before the explosion of talent in 2011 ans 2012). Second, not too many star players join via Superdraft every year, may be about three to five. So, don't get carried away by the buzz generated around 30+ players, most of whom will be forgotten soon.

Anyways, let me give you some good news, especially if your team doesn't have a high draft pick. Only half of the elite players were not top 10 drafts, and lot of players picked up from 11 to 30 became future MLS stars. Of course, if your favorite team's coach has real eye for diamond in the rough (or just lucky) can still spot another future Chris Wondolowski pick 89.

Top 100 players sorted by Castrol Index rank:

*Year is when the player joined MLS
PlayerYearSource of Recruitment
Donovan Ricketts2009Overseas Club
Marco Di Vaio2012Overseas Club
Mike Magee2003Draft pick #3
Robbie Keane2011Overseas Club
Chris Wondolowski2005Draft pick #89
Jack McInerney2010Draft pick #7
Nick Rimando2000Draft pick #35
Blas Pérez2012Overseas Club
Eddie Johnson 2001Draft pick #19
Graham Zusi   2009Draft pick #23
Diego Fagundez   2011Homegrown
Camilo Sanvezzo2011Overseas Club
Tim Cahill2012Overseas Club
Lamar Neagle 2009Trialist
Ryan Johnson 2006Draft pick #26
Thierry Henry 2010Overseas Club
Luis Robles 2012MLS Allocation
Will Bruin  2011Draft pick #11
Drew Moor2005Draft pick #6
Giles Barnes 2012Overseas Club
José Gonçalves2013Overseas Club
Dominic Oduro2006Draft pick #22
Jon Busch 2002Draft pick #23
Diego Valeri2013Overseas Club
Conor Casey2007MLS Allocation
Zac MacMath2011Draft pick #5
Shea Salinas2008Draft pick #15
Aurélien Collin2011Overseas Club
Marcelo Sarvas2012Overseas Club
Benny Feilhaber  2011MLS Allocation
Federico Higuaín2012Overseas Club
Brad Davis2002Draft pick #3
Nathan Sturgis2006Draft pick #12
Rodney Wallace2009Draft pick #6
Kyle Beckerman2000MLS Allocation
Chad Marshall2004Draft pick #2
Matt Besler2009Draft pick #8
Clinton Irwin2013USL
Javier Morales2007Overseas Club
Dilly Duka2010Draft pick #8
George John2009Draft pick #14
Deshorn Brown2013Draft pick #6
Omar González2009Draft pick #3
Sebastien Le Toux2009USL
Jamison Olave 2008Overseas Club
Erick Torres2013Overseas Club
Kenny Miller2012Overseas Club
Fabian Espindola2007Overseas Club
Landon Donovan2001MLS Allocation
Juninho2010Overseas Club
Amobi Okugo2010Draft pick #6
Patrick Nyarko2008Draft pick #7
Chance Myers2008Draft pick #1
Bernardo Anor2011Draft pick #48
Ike Opara2010Draft pick #3
Claudio Bieler2013Overseas Club
Matt Hedges2012Draft pick #11
Gyasi Zardes2013Homegrown
Pa-Modou Kah2013Overseas Club
Jairo Arrieta2012Overseas Club
Will Johnson2005Trialist
Michael Gspurning2012Overseas Club
Dan Kennedy2005Draft pick #38
Dillon Powers2013Draft pick #11
Stephen McCarthy2011Draft pick #24
Todd Dunivant2003Draft pick #6
Oscar Boniek García2012Overseas Club
Robert Earnshaw2013Overseas Club
A.J. DeLaGarza2009Draft pick #17
Oriol Rosell2013Overseas Club
Sheanon Williams2010USL
Warren Creavalle2012Draft pick #37
Josh Williams2010Trialist
Bobby Shuttleworth2009Trialist
Darlington Nagbe2011Draft pick #2
Michael Farfan2011Draft pick #23
Steven Caldwell2013Overseas Club
Kelyn Rowe2012Draft pick #3
Obafemi Martins2013Overseas Club
Soony Saad2011MLS Allocation
Jimmy Nielsen2010Overseas Club
Tally Hall2009Recruited by Club
Doneil Henry2010Homegrown
Justin Mapp2002Draft pick #4
Seth Sinovic2010Draft pick #25
Diego Chara2011Overseas Club
Jonathan Osorio2012Trialist
Osvaldo Alonso2009Overseas Club
Victor Bernardez2012Overseas Club
Djimi Traore2013Overseas Club
Lee Nguyen2012MLS Allocation
Andrew Jacobson2009MLS Allocation
Alvaro Saborio2010Overseas Club
Ricardo Clark2003Draft pick #2
Jeff Larentowicz2005Draft pick #45
Kenny Cooper2006Recruited by Club
Bobby Boswell2005Trialist
Andrew Driver2013Overseas Club
DeAndre Yedlin2013Homegrown
Troy Perkins2003Trialist